Navigating the world of fashion without showing the entire country what your underpants look like is about as much fun as getting punched in the face.
Thankfully (or
unfortunately, depending on where you stand), I load up on way too many fashion
magazines and reruns of Trinny &
Susannah, which has culminated in the solid delusion that when it comes to
VPLs (Visible Panty Lines), I know my sh*t.
Please
find below for your perusal, a guide to choosing the right kinds of underwear to slip on under different
sorts of bottoms … Also known as Underworld:
a Simple Guide to Decoding Underpants for easy referral when you’re discussing the relevance of this article with all
your friends.
SHAPEWEAR/CONTROL
BRIEFS
PROS:
The wunderkind of all underpants. Smoothes and controls unforgiving bumps under
your clothes. Makes you look slimmer. No VPL. A million different cuts from pants to skirts to bodysuits to
choose from.
CONS:
A million different cuts from pants to skirts to bodysuits to choose from. Also, I don’t know if it’s just me or
the brand of shape-wear I’ve got, but WHY IS IT SO HARD TO BREATHE IN ONE OF
THESE THINGS?!
WEAR
UNDER: Fitted garments e.g. bodycon-dresses, pencil skirts, etc. Sheer clothes.
HISTORICAL
EQUIVALENT: 19th century whalebone corsetry.
TANGAS/THONGS/G-STRINGS
PROS:
No VPL, no matter how hard you try to make one appear.
CONS: Wedgies.
WEAR
UNDER: Basically anything.
HISTORICAL
EQUIVALENT: Loincloth.
HIPSTERS
PROS:
Rides low on the waist - nobody will see your underpants peeking over the waist of your bottoms. Available in most cuts from bikinis to boyshorts.
CONS: People are more likely to see your butt-crack instead. Possible VPL, depending
on the cut of your choice.
WEAR
UNDER: Any bottoms that have a low-rise waist.
HISTORICAL
EQUIVALENT: Low-waisted ghaghras (except not really, 'cos ghaghras are legit garments in India ... I didn't want to leave this one blank ... I was doing so well ...)
BIKINI
PROS: Really comfortable. Good coverage.
CONS: Despite what lingerie companies will have
you believe, these are the most likely to give you VPL, even if they claim not
to.
WEAR UNDER: Whatever you like, if you don’t care
about VPL.
HISTORICAL EQUIVALENT: French knickers.
BOYSHORTS/BOYLEGS
PROS: Full-coverage. No VPL.
CONS: Has been known to ride up most uncomfortably.
WEAR UNDER: Anything you like – but especially if
thongs give you the heebie-jeebies, and shape-wear is too constricting.
HISTORICAL EQUIVALENT: Men’s underwear.
GRANNY PANTIES
PROS:
Comfortable. Celebrities are making them the trend du jour (see here & here). Man repellent.
CONS:
Man repellent.
WEAR
UNDER: Anything.
HISTORICAL
EQUIVALENT: ... I don't feel comfortable saying it.
GOING COMMANDO: THE LAST RESORT
PROS: No fuss, no muss. No VPL.
CONS: May get arrested for indecent exposure if not enough care is taken to ensure skirt or dress hems stay down.
WEAR UNDER: Anything ... as long as you're wearing something.
HISTORICAL EQUIVALENT: Birthday suits.
Lastly, some additional tips you may or may not find helpful to remember in your battle against VPL and VPG (Visible Panties in General):
- Wear undies that are close in shade to your skin-colour under sheer garments.
- Find undies that aren't too tight across the butt-cheek - this is usually what causes VPL to rear its ugly head.
- If you stumble across seamless underwear, buy that stuff up like the world is ending, because seamless underwear is GOLD.